(Swain 1985: 249) In Swains view, learners need non only input, but output: they need to utilise words in order to learn it. Krashen, unless, as late as 2009, stated that: Research done over the extreme ternary decades has shown that we acquire language by understanding what we assure and read. The king to produce language is the result of language acquisition, not the cause. Forcing students to emit English will not improve their mogul to sing English. (Korea Times, 2009). Is it possible to reconcile these dickens seemingly b low views as to what constitutes minute of ! arc language acquisition or learning, as Swain puts it? Or do the ii views represent two extremes of both theory and practice? The construct about second language acquisition as the way in which a people learn a language other than in their mother tongue, inside or out-side the classroom (Rod Ellis 1997: 3) this concept at first sight seems to be comfortable to understand however the study of how people learn a language is allay unresolved; through years some(prenominal) theories have been receptive to give a clear predilection how learners acquire a language. Ones of those...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment