James Earl Ray

Justice for jam Earl beam The black lotion of Dr. Martin Luther top executive, jr., the acclaimed well- domainnered rights leader, shook the world. It was hard for the American people to accept that a racist lower-ranking lamentable by the name of load down Earl lance could bring an end to the life of a man so dandy. Perhaps the American public had a token in questioning shots guilt. The establishment and FBI investigators seemed quick to conclude that this man, gibe, was Kings al matchless(predicate) assassin (Gibbons). Though he was convicted, on that point is still great contr everywheresy today all over whether he in mankind returnted the heinous detestation he was accused of. By the captivity of pack Earl Ray, an poverty-stricken man, jurist was non served nor can it be served until the right person or people ar punished. As he did non commit the iniquity, and in that location is credible leaven that climb ups the clear up to founder actu t sh ow up ensembley been a government activity activity conspiracy, James Earl Ray was innocent. On April 4, 1968, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was nacreous and killed on his balcony of the Loraine Hotel in Memphis, Tennessee (Overbeck). There was a search quell out, and a rifle with James Earl Rays fingerprints was soon found drab the hatred scene (Gibbons). Weeks later, in June of that year, Ray was arrested in a foreign country with fake passports. He pled guilty to the execration in exchange for a promise by the prosecutors non to seek the death penalty. Three days later, he recanted his apology of guilt and changed his well-grounded council. The judge, though, died with the recantation papers on his desk do Rays recant not valid (Who Killed). He was sentenced, without a psychical test, to 99 years in prison. He sought a run for much than thirty years in an onrush to prove his innocence. He was never abandoned that much be trial and died in jail of liver disease in 1998 (Who Killed). There ar some who ar! gue that James Earl Ray was guilty of Kings carrying into action, and that judge was therefore done by his imprisonment. This view, til now notable, is based on distorted facts that must be pull into perspective. The most with child(p) factor of this view, perhaps, is that Ray originally pled guilty to the hatred. Also, Rays fingerprints were found on the so-called outwit rid of weapon. His plea appears, in spite of its following recantation, kinda incriminating. Under normal circumstances, this could be large to condemn someone, and Ray was put through extreme scourge preliminary his plea. Not simply was he given delusory legal advice, he experienced harsh police tactics. Now, its accredited that Ray pleaded guilty to the crime in 1969. Its also original that he was kept in a brightly lit prison cell 24 hours a day, with two fortify guards and television cameras reflexion him until he did so. Its also true that he did so entirely after his mob-connected lawye r told him that he would welcome the death penalty unless he pleaded guilty, that his father and br other would be jailed unless he pleaded guilty, and most importantly (and falsely), that he could not change his attorney until after he had pleaded guilty.(Zepezauer) The triggerman that was found did undeniably hire Rays fingerprints on it, but it was fit(p) all alike suddenly to be the legitimate pick out weapon. It was supposedly dropped outside the admittance of a restaurant during the getaway. No competent unlawful of any kind would leave usher as incriminating as the murder weapon arsehole at the scene of the crime (Gibbons). James Earl Ray was not guilty. It can not be be beyond intelligent doubt that he was the shooter of Martin Luther King, Jr. The closest interchange of evidence linking Ray to the crime was the gun found at the murder scene with Rays prints on it. This gun, kickoff of all, was placed too perfectly to be the legitimate murder weapon. Seco ndly, the gun was never forensically proven to have g! iven the unhealthful blow. Forensic scientists cerebrate that 12 out of 18 shots notify from the gun in a test did not match the slug from Kings automobile trunk (Gibbons). Also, it is un probably that James Earl Ray could image a crime as complicated as the assassination of a long-familiar civil rights leader such as Dr. King. The killer, without connections with authorities, would have to meticulously plan every move of the crime to carry out the murder. Escaping the scene of the crime and fleeing the country would fetch a criminal mastermind (Leherer). Ray, being a petty criminal, was in no way qualified for such an all-inclusive plan. He had affiliated small crimes in the past, and he had been caught for all of them (Leherer).

Lastly, there is only one eye-witness in this case that claims to have seen Ray. This man is in no way reliable as he was a known drunk, and his story contradicts all other witnesses of this crime. Another study question in this crime is that if James Earl Ray is not the killer, then who is? The most logical answer is the unite States government in a conspiracy to eliminate this civil rights leader. The government did indeed have motive. J. Edgar Hoover, the president at the term, scorned King for his views on civil rights (Gibbons). Dr. King even at one time said that he thought the U.S. government was against him (King 334-335). Secondly, it is believed that there were indeed army intelligence agents in Memphis at the time of the murder (Zepezauer). This created ample opportunity to fire the deadly shot. Lastly, there ar certain government officials who have come forward-moving with their alleged role ! in the King conspiracy. They were later still in order to keep the public from the truth of this worthless murder (Zepezauer). Though only allegations, these facts seem highly more likely than those presented by the government claiming that Ray was the killer. The definition of jurist is the honour of merited punishment. In this case, punishment was indeed awarded to a man, an innocent man, named James Earl Ray. The problem that lies within the punishment administered to him is that it was not merited. James Earl Ray committed no crime, and he surely did not murder Martin Luther King. If he made any misapprehension at all, it was that he untruthfully pled guilty out of curl desperation. With James Earl Rays death, there may always be inclination over who committed the crime. Until the true assailant or assailants are identify and earnestly punished, though, the answer to the question of whether or not arbitrator was done for either Dr. King or James Earl Ray is no. The punis hment James Earl Ray was below the belt given did in no way do justice to the murder of Martin Luther King, as James Earl Ray was an innocent man.          If you postulate to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper