Plato’s Unwritten Doctrines from a Hermeneutical Point of View* :: Philosophy Philosophical dialogue Essays

Platos Unwritten Doctrines from a Hermeneutical Point of figure*ABSTRACT In this paper, I get out show the hidden root of dialogue in Platos thought, in order to examine the validness of the so-called esoteric Plato. The confrontation between dialogicity and unwritten doctrines is the main constitution of this article. These two views Hermeneutics and Tbingen School be not far by on concrete contents, with more or less variations. provided it mustiness be noticed that both conceptions of Platonic thinking are confounding and that is reflected in their explanations of Platos own philosophical project.To begin with, I will not compare each point of the Hermeneutic and Tubingen School positions. I will explain, so far as I suffer understand, why the explanation of the Tbingen School is unsatisfactory. (1) These insufficiencies are not related to its deep analysis of the Platonic oral tradition, exactly to its interpretation. (2) The question is wholly hermeneutical and refe rs to the pretension, reference point and value that this oral doctrine tramp have in Platonic philosophy.I will avoid the content questions, because they are far external from the purpose of this paper. The implicit question in these two trends is the following can Platos own philosophy be reduced to a metaphysical system? (3) The affirmative answer to that question holds the whole account of the Tbingen School. But I consider that this assumption is not correct and that it supposes the extrusion of alien elements to Platonic philosophy. And my task in this contribution is to show why.Platos thought has two axes thematical and formal. Thematically it moves around the Good, and formally, around the dialectic. Both themes are the ground of his whole work and the ideas are not more than the effort of joining them. The dialectical access to ideas is fully congruous with the question of the Good, at all levels. This is clearly exposed in the beginning of Philebus, (4) where it is n ecessary to clear up the truth about the good through dialogue, with all required efforts. But dialogue is not a combat between enemies to win star position, but the battle between allies supporting the truth.Dialectic is not another thing than the ability to guide a conversation, that is, the capability to dialogue. (5) Because of that, linguistic process exactly (6) has no secondary position in Platos philosophy. veritable(a) one of his works is wholly dedicated to that theme Cratylus , and there it can be seen that language is neither pure nature nor complete artifact.